是这样的。
“How are combinations of I Demand and non-I Demand dogmas resolved in respect to sharing?
The important thing to remember is that there are I Demand dogmas and non-I Demand dogmas; there
are no I Demand cards or non-I Demand cards. Therefore, treat each dogma in turn, resolving it either as
I Demand (granting immunity to opponents with enough icons) or as a shareable dogma (sharing with
opponents with enough icons). For example, let’s use Oars:
[Castle]: I demand you transfer a card with a [Crown] from your hand to my score pile! If you do, draw a
1!
[Castle]: If no cards were transferred due to this demand, draw a 1.
Amy has Oars and five [Castle] icons. Bob has six [Castle] icons, and Chris has two [Castle] icons. Amy
activates Oars. The first effect is resolved; Bob is immune to the I Demand, as he has enough [Castle]
icons. Chris must transfer a card with a [Crown] from his hand to Amy’s score pile; unfortunately for
Amy, he has no such cards in hand. Next, the second effect is resolved. Bob shares the effect; no cards
were transferred due to the demand, and therefore he draws a 1. Then, Amy draws a 1. Finally, Amy
receives a free Draw action (since Bob shared the dogma).”
比如船桨， 第一特技是征用类"要别人带王冠的手牌"，第二特技是非征用类"如果第一特技没要到任何牌，自抽一个1“。要先全场结算第一特技，再全场结算第二特技。
假设AMY发动船桨特技，BOB属性优势，CHRIS属性劣势。这时先结算第一特技，BOB不用给牌，CHRIS要给。假设CHRIS这时没有王冠手牌，那么第一特技结算完毕。然后结算第二特技，从下家先开始，BOB属性优势，必须分享特技。第一特技确实没要到任何牌，所以第二特技会造成抽1，BOB抽1。CHRIS属性劣势不分享第二特技。AMY享受特技，也抽1。最后由于有其他玩家对特技的分享造成了他盘面的变动，AMY再多抽一张。
