永远不要去想这张卡牌应该如何如何使用，应该是如何如何的意思
而是说你从卡牌文字上得到的信息是什么就是什么
People are confusing what they want the card to do (and what they assume it was intended to do based on the name) with what the card actually says. I mean, if Ser Gregor Clegane was printed with a STR of 0, would we argue how the "0" on the card really means "5," or would we play it as "0" until errata was issued? Because that's what people are doing here: trying to make "0" mean "5" instead of accepting that what was printed might not be what was intended - and waiting for FFG to fix it.
