【BGG精选GeekList(20)】疯狂夫妻档的61款合作类游戏（2013版）

anf

本帖最后由 anf 于 2013-7-28 22:35 编辑

原文地址：http://www.boardgamegeek.com/gee ... guide-2013-edition/
原作者：Brian Modreski
翻译：anf转贴时请注明原文作者、原文地址、翻译者。译者注：2011年我曾经翻译过（/thread-41045-1-1.html），现在原作者出了更新版。原List很长，包括很多扩展，翻译时未翻译扩展，未翻译部分作者评分<6的游戏，未翻译部分游戏评价，感兴趣者看原文。部分游戏不属于纯合作游戏。游戏按字母顺序排列。

本系列：
1、拉新人的30种策略30（和30个游戏）
2、桌游人的10大谎言
 3、我那些“非玩家”朋友眼中的71款桌游
 4、对刚入门的新人的买游戏的建议
 5、1578个她如是说（她眼中的桌游）
6、从最hot的图片评价游戏
 7、历年最多人玩的十大桌游
 8、精选的电脑桌面(图大杀猫)
9、25款纯合作游戏
 10、TOP100的替代品
 11、每个游戏都该有的规则（搞笑版）12、2011年度美图 13、男、女的TOP50流行游戏 14、历久弥坚的十年老兵 15、在TOP100中占据/曾占据4席的大神设计师们 16、十大工人放置游戏
 17、TOP500配件全家福 18、Meeples的生活（几张趣图）
19、你想当老师？

======
评分: 我们夫妻俩评分的平均，从1到10，6分基本是平均水平

上瘾度：
在最初的几个月里只玩了1、2次
第一个月玩了1、2次
平均: 第一个月里玩了不到5次
第一个月玩了5-10次
第一个月玩了11-20次
第一个月玩了>20次

长期可重玩性:
玩了几次就不玩了
玩了10次就不玩了
平均: 玩了25-30次就不玩了
超过50次后仍在玩
超过100次后仍在玩
超过300次后仍在玩

策略因素: 策略相对运气的多少

模式: 合作、单人、竞争……

2人: 2人的游戏效果、特殊规则

个人/小组游戏: 游戏是否会被一个人控制，还是要群体决策

=========
1. Board Game: Arkham Horror [Average Rating:7.54 Overall Rank:80]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic175966_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度：
长期可重玩性:
策略因素: 不好评价。基础版有一些选择总比其他选择好。
模式：合作
2人：每人一个investigator可以，建议每人两个
个人/小组游戏: 适中
基本信息：2_{8人（人太多不好），2}4小时，难度较低
简评：大游戏（占地大，耗时长，规则厚，卡牌多，初始难布置）。如果专注于有限的几件事，很容易赢。开始很紧张，后来越来越轻松。人多时等待时间长。
你可以得到：史诗历险，变数多，有角色扮演感，扩展花钱多
无视，如果你：确实想动脑筋赢；地方小时间短；不喜欢长规则；不喜欢记忆大量卡牌

2. Board Game: Break the Safe [Average Rating:6.12 Overall Rank:2531] http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic475435_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度：
长期可重玩性:
策略因素：低，但也有一些小技巧
模式：合作
2人：可以
个人/小组游戏: 偏向于个人
基本信息：2-4人，30分钟，人少时简单
简评：扮演间谍潜入敌方的金库。有时间限制。运气成分大，基本是骰子+行动。
你可以得到：时间短，简单，可以和小孩玩
无视，如果你：不喜欢骰子+行动；不喜欢时间限制

                                                                                                                                                                                                [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2728586#item2728586]3.[/url]      Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/43443/castle-panic]Castle Panic[/url]     [Average Rating:6.80 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=514#514]514[/url]]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic496923_t.jpg[/img]评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性:
策略因素: 一个四步程序和人玩的也差不多A four step script could play about as well as a person.
模式：合作、担任、竞争、1对多
2人：不错
个人/小组游戏: 策略低无所谓
基本信息：1-6人，30分钟，难度随机一般偏低
简评：卡牌杀怪兽，看谁杀的多。偶尔可以无脑欢乐一下。
你可以得到：和喜欢杀怪兽但玩不了太难游戏的孩子一起玩；无脑放松；
无视，如果你：喜欢在游戏中做决策；不喜欢玩太简单的游戏

                                                                                                                                                                                               [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2679168#item2679168]4.[/url]     Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/4424/cranium-hoopla]Cranium Hoopla[/url]   [Average Rating:6.34 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=1768#1768]1768[/url]]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic196086_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Addictive? - Average -
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: This is all skill. Not DEEP skill mind you - it's a party guessing game - but it's still player skill.
Modes: Co-op
Players: 2-Lots
With a couple: Can still be fun, but it's really meant as a group party game.
Play Time: 15-20 minutes
Difficulty: No idea how to rate this as it's so player dependent. I'd say medium-ish. You could always add or subtract cards from the pile to make it easier or harder.
Individual/Group Play: Complete individuality. This is entirely a communication game.
Mini-Review
Co-op Cranium party game? Say what? Yep, I'm not kidding. And it's actually pretty fun.
Gameplays is very simple. Each player has a hand of cards, each showing a person, place or thing. On your turn, you roll the die to decide which activity you need to use to get the rest of the team to guess one of your cards. There's drawing, charades (with sound effects) and two word clue options.
The team plays against a timer. For a relaxed game, you only start and stop the timer while someone is giving clues. For a panicked frenzy, the timer runs constantly.
Everyone needs to get rid of their cards in hand and all the cards in a draw pile before the timer runs out. You can give up on a card if no one is getting it, but then you need to add a penalty card to the draw pile.
It's simple, it's light, it's a lot of fun with a high energy crowd. It keeps everyone involved all the time, and gives you a chance to be creative as you give clues. It's also a good game for playing with a few people around who aren't quite into the game; they can still guess without needing to give clues and take turns.
Oh, and if someone wants to join in mid-game? Deal them a few cards! Someone needs to leave? Put their cards on the pile.

Get if for:

A co-op party game.
Stretching some creative brain muscles.
Large groups.
Casual gamer groups.
Keeping everyone playing and involved all the time.

Avoid it if:

You don't like party games.

You don't like looking silly while trying to charade out "Eifell Tower".

                                                                                                                                                                                            [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2733062#item2733062]5.[/url]       Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/6883/cthulhu-mash]Cthulhu Mash[/url]     [Average Rating:5.33 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=7434#7434]7434[/url]]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic45376_t.jpg[/img]
--- WARNING: Not enough play experience to put much solid here ---
Our rating:
Addictive?
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: Never played enough to find out. Probably low.
Modes: Competitive, Solo, Co-op. Sorta.
Players: 1-4
With a couple: Works about as well as with any number.
Play Time: 1 hour
Difficulty: Never played enough to find out. Probably moderate.
Individual/Group Play: Not much to gain with PbC.
Mini-Review
A random monster bash with Cthlhuhoid monsters. There's some sort of premise about dead souls having to confront the horrors they encountered in life to escape the underworld, or something like that. Basically, you set up a little board and move around it trying to defeat monsters and monster generators.
There's some nice touches in the forms of leveling up characters and having different skills for different characters.
While it claims co-op play, it's not really a co-op; in the normal, competitive, mode, the opponent on your left controls the monsters. This has no replacement in co-op or solo play, so you just have to try to play both sides.
I wouldn't mind giving this another try, but it didn't impresss us enough to bring it readily back to the table.

Get if for:

Vaguely Cthulhu themed monster fighting.

Avoid it if:

You don't want vaguely Cthulhu themed monster fighting?

6. Board Game: D-Day Dice [Average Rating:7.21 Overall Rank:365]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1206256_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性:
策略因素:
模式: 合作、单人、半合作
2人：不错
个人/小组游戏: 适中
基本信息：1-4人，30分钟，难度低
简评：每人控制一队士兵，组队战斗
你可以得到：骰子的乐趣，尝试不同的场景，轻量级欢乐
无视，如果你：想要深度挑战，不喜欢骰子

7. Board Game: Defenders of the Realm [Average Rating:7.49 Overall Rank:169]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic649329_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性:平均
策略因素: -
模式: 竞争，合作（忽略竞争规则）
2人：可以只玩2个英雄，每人控制2个英雄乐趣更高
个人/小组游戏: 略偏向个人，但有些决策需要小组计划
基本信息：2-4人，60_{120分钟，难度低}
简评：兽人和不死的瘟疫危机
你可以得到：神话背景的瘟疫危机；角色很酷；内容很多的史诗游戏；半合作
无视，如果你：更喜欢设计仔细、规则精炼的游戏；不喜欢在同色地区多版图里找；不喜欢掷骰；对背景较真

                                                                                                                                                                                               [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2679174#item2679174]8.[/url]       Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/5735/dragonriders-of-pern-the-book-game]Dragonriders of Pern: The Book Game[/url]         [Average Rating:5.15 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=7595#7595]7595[/url]]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic147683_t.jpg[/img] Our rating:
Addictive?
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: Sorta. Technically, it's all skill. But until you figure out the system, it sure doesn't feel that way.
Modes: Co-op, Competitive. Cannot be played solo.
Players: 2
With a couple: It's a 2 player only game.
Play Time: 15-20 minutes
Difficulty: Hard while trying to figure the system out, easy afterwards.
Individual/Group Play: Tough to rate. With the spoiler, probably encourages group play.

Mini-Review
The theme is going to be really strange if you haven't had the Dragonriders of Pern series! Players take to the air on dragons, to burn down falling Thread - a deadly parasite from another planet.
Borderline co-op. Normal play has you competing for points, but you can also just play to stop all the falling thread.
The game consists of two books. One player takes each book. Your book shows a dragon-saddle view from your dragon. You'll see both your wingmate (the other player) and a tangle of thread. You both pick a maneuver, and the combined results has you turn to a new page showing the results of the maneuver. Maneuver well, and you can line up the thread and burn it. Maneuver really bad and you can get burned by thread or accidentally scorch your wingmate!
There's a threadfall track that decreases each turn and resets when you flame a piece of thread; go too many turns without flaming a piece, and the thread hits the ground. Too many hit and you lose.
There's a pattern to how all this works. In fact, there's a "spoiler" section in the back of the books that explain this. DON'T read the spoiler. It kind of ruins the game (I was a kid back when I first had these, I was impatient, I eventually read the spoiler).
Not much to it, and the game gets way less interesting once you know the pattern. It is very portable, and it has a campaign where you can level up and learn new maneuvers, which is kind of cool. The campaign even takes into account the different kinds of dragons.

Get if for:

Playing with huge fans of the Pern series.
A highly portable co-op.
Campaign play.

Avoid it if:

You won't be able to resist reading the spoiler.
You want variety in your game play - it's all pretty samey.

9. Board Game: Dungeon Fighter [Average Rating:7.01 Overall Rank:633]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1111553_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性:
策略因素: But keep in mind that's almost entirely physical dexterity!
模式: 合作、单人
2人：不错
个人/小组游戏: 偏向个人
基本信息：1-5人，45分钟，难度高
简评：用骰子击打版图来打怪兽（类似飞镖），根据怪兽的不同，可能需要闭眼、骰子弹跳过障碍等等
你可以得到：扔骰子的乐趣，看其他玩家的滑稽动作
无视，如果你：觉得扔骰子没意思，不喜欢其他玩家看你的滑稽动作

10. Board Game: Dungeons & Dragons: Castle Ravenloft Board Game [Average Rating:7.09 Overall Rank:318]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic660244_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Addictive?
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: Some skill, but mostly it's luck of the die and draw.
Modes: Co-op, Solo.
Players: 1-5
With a couple: Works poorly. One character each is a bit dull (and the game doesn't scale well). Two characters each is hard to manage due to the huge glut of cards.
Play Time: 1 hour
Difficulty: Depends on scenario and character count. Usually easy with 4 characters. Some scenarios are virtually impossible (and not in a good way) with 2 characters.
Individual/Group Play: Not really enough skill to matter.

Mini-Review
A fast paced co-op dungeoncrawl with tons of cool minis. This sounds so awesome. How could it go so wrong?
The rulebook is a mess, the scenario book even more of a mess. Be prepared to have no idea how to play some scenarios. If you have no idea what to do with a component, it's probably just not used in this scenario. Probably. Or they just missed explaining it. Or you missed it in the rules and should probably go back and re-read. How do you know which situation is which? Beats me!
You control a party of adventurers battling against the forces of a vampire lord in a variety of scenarios. You can choose from 5 different heroes, each with different abilities. Like, one character will have a +7 to hit instead of a +6 to hit. Ok, ok, they do each have some unique abilities, but overall they wind up feeling pretty much the same after a few plays.
You wander through the dungeon in a mostly random manner; it doesn't matter which way you go (usually), you'll find the end eventually. Along the way, you meet monsters. Monsters attack you (roll a die) and then you attack them (roll a die). Monsters have a 'script' on their cards that they follow. While there's some interesting variety (spiders web you, burning skeletons attack everyone in a room, etc), they tend to show up, attack and die almost immediately. This wound up feeling to us like "draw a card, see how many hit points you lose".
To keep time pressure on, if you don't explore, you draw an Event card. If you DO explore, about half the time you draw an Event card anyway. The Event cards are, for the most part, "draw a card, see how many hit points you lose."
We loved this for a few plays. We really did. Our excitement was very high. But the illusion of anything interesting going on dropped off very fast. Draw a card, see how many hit points you lose. Roll to hit. Draw a card, see how many hit points you lose. Roll to hit. Over and over.

Get if for:

The minis. Pretty much worth it if you want a bunch of fantasy minis even if you then toss the rest of the game in the trash. Just look at that Dracoliche!
A quick playing dungeon crawl.
A game that's easy to get new players into the action on once you know how to play.
Some good excitement for a few plays.

Avoid it if:

You try the following exercise and shudder:
1) Draw a card and see how many hit points you lose.
2) Roll a die.
3) Repeat steps 1-2 ten times in a row.
You want to make sense out of your rules.
You want interesting, meaningful choices in gamplay.
11. Board Game: Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of Ashardalon Board Game [Average Rating:7.40 Overall Rank:257]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic968280_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Addictive? NOTE: Might have been had we not already played Ravenloft.
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: Some skill, but mostly it's luck of the die and draw.
Modes: Co-op, Solo.
Players: 1-5
With a couple: Works poorly. One character each is a bit dull (and the game doesn't scale well). Two characters each is hard to manage due to the huge glut of cards.
Play Time: 1-2 hours
Difficulty: Depends on scenario and character count. Usually easy with 4 characters. Some scenarios are virtually impossible (and not in a good way) with 2 characters.
Individual/Group Play: Not really enough skill to matter.

Mini-Review
A fast paced co-op dungeoncrawl with tons of cool minis. This sounds so awesome. How could it go so wrong?
The rulebook is a mess, the scenario book even more of a mess. Be prepared to have no idea how to play some scenarios. If you have no idea what to do with a component, it's probably just not used in this scenario. Probably. Or they just missed explaining it. Or you missed it in the rules and should probably go back and re-read. How do you know which situation is which? Beats me!
You control a party of adventurers battling against the forces of a dragon in a variety of scenarios. You can choose from 5 different heroes, each with different abilities. Like, one character will have a +7 to hit instead of a +6 to hit. Ok, ok, they do each have some unique abilities, but overall they wind up feeling pretty much the same after a few plays.
You wander through the dungeon in a mostly random manner; it doesn't matter which way you go (usually), you'll find the end eventually. Along the way, you meet monsters. Monsters attack you (roll a die) and then you attack them (roll a die). Monsters have a 'script' on their cards that they follow. While there's some interesting variety (spiders web you, burning skeletons attack everyone in a room, etc), they tend to show up, attack and die almost immediately. This wound up feeling to us like "draw a card, see how many hit points you lose".
To keep time pressure on, if you don't explore, you draw an Event card. If you DO explore, about half the time you draw an Event card anyway. The Event cards are, for the most part, "draw a card, see how many hit points you lose."
We loved Ravenloft for a few plays. We really did. Our excitement was very high. But the illusion of anything interesting going on dropped off very fast. Draw a card, see how many hit points you lose. Roll to hit. Draw a card, see how many hit points you lose. Roll to hit. Over and over. Wrath was just more of the same. However, I suspect we would not have liked it as much as Ravenloft even had we not already gotten bored of the game.

What it does different from Ravenloft:

The rulebook is better. In fact, some clarifications in the rulebook only apply to Ravenloft. This in itself may be a little confusing.
The treasures are much more interesting. In fact, we felt a bit overloaded on treasures in Ashardalon!
Wrath has "campaign" play. Campaigns consist of playing the same scenario with a different random monster at the end over and over, with a few upgrades carrying over between games. There's a short campaign and a long campaign. We could barely make it through (interest wise) the short campaign, and the long one looks almost exactly the same, but longer.
There are some doors and "long passages" to make exploring a bit more interesting. We never opened a door while playing.
The scenarios are a bit better explained than Ravenloft. Apparently, having decided that clearly explaining scenarios was a weakness of theirs, all the scenarios in Wrath are virtually identical, aside from a card you draw at the end to determine exactly which boss monster you meet.
They have some new traps in the event cards that take you out of the game until you roll a 10+ on a D20. In a 4-5 player game, since players may only get 4-5 turns each, that can easily be "out for the rest of the game".[/color]

Get if for:

The minis. Pretty much worth it if you want a bunch of fantasy minis even if you then toss the rest of the game in the trash. Just look at that dragon!
A quick playing dungeon crawl.
A game that's easy to get new players into the action on once you know how to play.
Some good excitement for a few plays.

Avoid it if:

You try the following exercise and shudder:
1) Draw a card and see how many hit points you lose.
2) Roll a die.
3) Repeat steps 1-2 ten times in a row.
You want interesting, meaningful choices in gameplay.

12. Board Game: Elder Sign [Average Rating:7.06 Overall Rank:319]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1024923_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Addictive? - Avg -
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: Low
Modes: Co-op, Solo
Players: 1-8
With a couple: Plays great playing one character each.
Play Time: 1 hour
Difficulty: Easy
Individual/Group Play: Not really enough skill to matter much. Picking adventures is maybe group oriented.

Mini-Review
Out-roll Cthulhu!
Elder Sign is the mini die rolling version of Arkham Horror. Apparently, the entire game takes place in one museum. Having every mythos monster around wind up in one city at the same time was odd. Having them all in one museum is the sort of thematic bit it's better to just not think about.
I've seen this compared to Yahtzee, or called a 'dice' game. Its not. Those type of comparisions assume that you will roll the dice, and then try to figure how to use your roll. Most gamery dice games, such as Alien Frontiers or King of Tokyo, will offer multiple possibilities for what you want on a given turn and how you will use your roll.
While Elder Sign LOOKS like those of type of games, the dice are really just a convoluted task resolution. You pick an adventure, and roll to see if you can resolve that adventure. Choices about how to use your dice are usually very straightforward.
You have a bunch of cards to improve your rolls, but most just give you an extra die.
The risk-reward balance on the cards isn't real strong, so usually it's obvious which adventure to undertake.
Overall, this is a choice-weak kind of mindless game. At 15 or 20 minutes, I'd enjoy this as a quick filler a lot. But it runs an hour or more, and for me it stretches its welcome at that length. There's just not enough there to justify that kind of time.
The game is very easy as is. Given the randomness, I don't mind that, but it's a common complaint.
A lot of fan effort has gone into making the game harder. Most of the ideas involve removing choices and making the game longer as well. Since our complaints are A) Too few choices and B) too long, these have not been good fits for us
It's still one we play every now and then though. The dice are cute.

Get if for:

Mindless Cthulhu-themed die rolling.
A game for when you don't want to think.

Avoid it if:

You want choices.
You want a challenge.

13. Board Game: Escape: The Curse of the Temple [Average Rating:7.24 Overall Rank:264]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1724684_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性:
策略因素:
模式: 合作、单人
2人：不错
个人/小组游戏: 有实时因素，偏向于个人
基本信息：1-5人（可扩充至6人），10分钟，难度低但可变化
简评：快节奏骰子游戏，玩家尝试激活神秘宝石来从神庙逃亡
你可以得到：快速、轻量级的行动；5人也能10分钟搞定；欢乐
无视，如果你：不喜欢实时；希望不仅仅是行动堆砌的惊悚

                                                                                                                                                                                                 [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2436340#item2436340]14.[/url]    Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/8017/feurio]Feurio![/url]     [Average Rating:6.18 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=2157#2157]2157[/url]]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic32854_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Addictive? - Avg -
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor:
Modes: Co-op, Competitive
Players: 1-4
With a couple: Plays great!
Play Time: 30 minutes
Difficulty: Moderate
Individual/Group Play: Very strongly encourages group play. This is basically a single player puzzle with players sharing the pieces.

Mini-Review
A puzzley fire-fighting game. You draw tiles and place firefighters on them following certain rules. In the co-op game, you need to place all of the firefighters by the end of the game to win.
This is very much a puzzle game, spiced up by the randomness of the tile draw. It's quick and easy to play and good for a filler co-op. The competitive game is also fun, and plays very differently from the co-op game.
The game Vulkan! is posted online and plays with the same components but different rules. Also very much a puzzle game. A completed game of Feurio will leave you with a board all set up for Vulkan, so it works well to play one right after the other.

Get if for:

Puzzle solving fun.
Quick and easy gameplay.

Avoid it if:

You don't like puzzles.

                                                                                                                                                                                          [color=Red][b][url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2370006#item2370006]15.[/url]     Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/100901/flash-point-fire-rescue]Flash Point: Fire Rescue[/url]       [Average Rating:7.50 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=130#130]130[/url]] [/b][/color]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1129370_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性:
策略因素: Good blend of skill in planning and picking good actions, but there's a lot of luck in the die rolls.
模式: 合作、单人
2人：不错
个人/小组游戏: 鼓励集体
基本信息：1-6人，30_{60分钟，3个难度级别可选}
简评：背景鲜明。玩家扮演消防队救火，火势由骰子驱动
你可以得到：有关英雄的鲜明背景的游戏；过程简单；很多的“噢，不！”
无视，如果你：想要深度挑战；想每一轮有独特的行动；不喜欢很多的“噢，不！”

16、17为15的扩充

18. Board Game: Forbidden Island [Average Rating:6.98 Overall Rank:315]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic646458_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性: 平均
策略因素:
模式: 合作
2人：不错
个人/小组游戏: 小组
基本信息：2-4人，30分钟，4个难度级别
简评：逃离要沉没的岛屿，收集宝物，和Pancemic类似。
你可以得到：简单易学的合作体验；欢乐和挑战
无视，如果你：喜欢深度游戏；已经有Pandemic

19. Board Game: Fortune and Glory: The Cliffhanger Game [Average Rating:7.27 Overall Rank:423] http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic946736_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度 *
长期可重玩性: *

仅考虑到欢乐的话，评分会更高一些
策略因素:

模式: 合作、单人、竞争、组队
2人：不确定
个人/小组游戏: 混合
基本信息：1-8人，60_{120分钟，4人难度低}
简评：刺激的寻宝游戏
你可以得到：过山车式的冒险；美工好；轻量级欢乐
无视，如果你：想要有意义的决策

                                                                                                                                                                                          [color=Red][b][url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2362365#item2362365]20.[/url]          Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/37046/ghost-stories]Ghost Stories[/url]          [Average Rating:7.39 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=138#138]138[/url][/b][/color]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic346825_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性:
策略因素: -
模式: 合作、单人
2人：少于4人时规则略微变化不错
个人/小组游戏: 面向小组
基本信息：1-4人，90分钟，难度高
简评：道士降妖驱鬼
你可以得到：挑战；解谜冒险；不错的背景
无视，如果你：不喜欢被NPC打败；不喜欢不清楚的规则书

21_{24为20的扩展}

25. Board Game: Hanabi & Ikebana [Average Rating:7.57 Unranked]（译者注：这里说的是Hanabi）
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic729321_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度 16 plays in the first month.
长期可重玩性: 300+ plays and still playing at least weekly.
策略因素: A lot of skill, but luck in the card order.
模式: 合作
2人：不错
个人/小组游戏: 倾向于个人，交流受限
基本信息：2-5人，20分钟，拿高分难度高
简评：按顺序和颜色出牌组成焰火
你可以得到：推理的挑战；快速且上瘾
无视，如果你：需要游戏有背景；不喜欢交流受限

26. Board Game: Hooyah: Navy Seals Card Game [Average Rating:6.44 Overall Rank:3644]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1376132_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Modes: Co-op, Solo
Players: 1-4
With a couple: Plays normally.
Play Time: Unknown. Listed at 45 minutes.
Difficulty: Varies by scenario.
Individual/Group Play: Mixed.

Quick Overview Vaguely rummy style card game of military team action. Draft cards to build the color combos you'll need to complete various tasks. A few special cards to spice things up, and options to push for more time drawing cards at the cost of more damage. Pretty low on theme.
Why we didn't buy it: It was OK, but lacked excitement. I'd play it again, but wouldn't make an effort to do so.

27. Board Game: Legendary: A Marvel Deck Building Game [Average Rating:7.66 Overall Rank:171
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1430769_t.jpg[/img]
不算是合作游戏
评分:
We've played a ton of this light deckbuilder, and, despite several flaws, enjoy it a lot, as a competitive game.
Lots of people on BGG apparently enjoy playing it cooperatively. I'm not really sure how they do, since the entire game is focused on scoring points, which are meaningless in co-op, and major game elements don't work at all if you aren't competing. In particular, there will often be no reason to fight villains, and you can get crazily powerful just by letting one player get strong combos without anyone else competing for the cards.
If you want to just toss out hero cards, say "Cool, we're playing a co-op with Wolverine!" and not stress too much about it, by all means go for it.
28. Board Game: Legends of Andor [Average Rating:7.44 Overall Rank:329
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1405984_t.jpg[/img]Our rating:
Addictive?
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: Low, though there's one key thing to figure out each quest. Well, more "add up" that "figure out".
Modes: Co-op
Players: 2-4
With a couple: Plays normally.
Play Time: 1 - 1.5 hours.
Difficulty: Low at first, even lower if you look at the events or are replaying a scenario.
Individual/Group Play: Fairly group play oriented.

Mini-Review
Andor sets you on a variety of fantasy quests. In typical fashion, you each have a character and you travel the land finding important objects and fighting monsters. The game is scenario driven, with 5 included scenarios. Each scenario is represented by a few cards that are stacked in order, so that you proceed through the stack as the game progresses.
The basic mechanics are interesting, and revolve around managing actions. There's not a lot of variety (only a few enemies, who aren't very distinctive, and only a few items).
However, there's one key mechanic in this game that really hurt our opinion of it. There are two normal conditions for losing a game; if too many monsters reach the castle, or if time runs out. However, every time you defeat a monster, time advances by one day. Defeating a monster is basically the WORST thing that can happen to you in the game. Aside from being incredibly unthematic, it also means that the game looks "tense", but the tension is entirely artificial - the monsters "score points" because you beat them! The game then centers around counting up and determining the number of monsters you can safely beat. Not only isn't this terribly exciting, but it means that in a game where maybe 80% of the mechanics focus on combat, each hero may only fight once or twice in a game.
On top of that, the other main threat comes in the form of trial-and-error gameplay. You draw a card and it says "Oh, because you increased your strength too much, you LOSE!". When strength is normally good and you had no prior way of knowing that it would be bad in this scenario. Once you know about a trial-and-error element, you'll never do that again.
If neither of those elements bother you, the rest of the game is quite enjoyable.

Get if for:

Nice components and art.
Excellent "learn as you play" teaching setup.
Variety of scenarios.

Avoid it if:

An unthematic "punishment" mechanic that dominate the gameplay will bother you.
You'll be bored with a simple puzzle.
You don't like trial and error gameplay.

You like to be able to look up rules in the rulebook.

                                                                                                                                                                                           [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2679162#item2679162]29.[/url]      Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/823/lord-of-the-rings]Lord of the Rings[/url]           [Average Rating:6.88 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=381#381]381[/url]]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic479124_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性:
策略因素: Bad tile flips can devastate you very quickly with little you can do about it.
模式: 合作
2人：不错
个人/小组游戏: 适中
基本信息：2-5人，难度根据Sauron的起始地点而不同
简评：纯合作
你可以得到：魔戒控的满足；扎实的资源管理游戏
无视，如果你：想要细致的背景；喜欢游戏中途的阶段性胜利

30为魔戒卡牌

                                                                                                                                                                                                [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2436371#item2436371]31.[/url]    Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/96848/mage-knight-board-game]Mage Knight Board Game[/url]        [Average Rating:8.18 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=9#9]9[/url]]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1083380_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性: 平均
策略因素:
模式: 合作、单人、竞争
2人：不错
个人/小组游戏: 混合
基本信息：1-3人（竞争模式1_{4人），120}180分钟，难度低
简评：史诗历险
你可以得到：史诗历险；海量构建角色的途径；海量探索世界的方式
无视，如果你：不喜欢downtime；不喜欢需要巧手的游戏；喜欢在奇幻游戏中有大量的文字和骰子

                                                                                                                                                                                                [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2734627#item2734627]32.[/url]      Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/124708/mice-and-mystics]Mice and Mystics[/url]     [Average Rating:7.98 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=88#88]88[/url]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1312072_t.jpg[/img]Our rating:
Addictive? ? Tough to rate - we played through all the scenarios, but we were forcing ourselves to finish it towards the end.
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: Low
Modes: Co-op.*

Except for one scenario which has a badly implemented enemy player.
Players: 1-4**
** Except for one scenario which is 3 player only, and one which is effectively 3 player only.
With a couple: You usually have to play multiple characters. Sometimes the characters don't divide evenly. Once, one of you has to play two characters with the other plays a sort-of enemy,
Play Time: 1/2 hour - 2 hours; depends on scenario.
Difficulty: Usually easy. We played the whole campaign with a variant that made it harder; this was accidental at first, but we just stuck with it even after realizing the mistake.
Individual/Group Play: Leans toward group play. Requires group decision making in places since the entire group must take one path.

Mini-Review
A group of heroes turns into mice to thwart the plot of an evil witch. (It kind of almost makes sense...sorta. If you squint. )
M&M is a scenario based dungeon crawl game. You set up a scenario, and move your mice through the castle fighting roaches and rat guards. Usually on a turn you'll just attack a foe and maybe move around a little. Spice comes in the form of special abilities, which cost cheese to activate. You can also spend cheese to gain new abilities.
I think this game is oriented towards kid and family play, though I have some doubts at kids being able to figure out the scenario setup.
There's a story that consists of paragraph blocks read at the start and end of each scenario. It has a few huge plot gaps that I think even kids will question. It also does some silly things like having a scenario with only two mice, one of which MUST be Collin on it (while the other four mice are going off on a different quest) and then giving flavor text in the scenario to Filch and Tilda. Note that Filch and Tilda cannot possibly both be along on this quest.
Mice can add new abilities and carry over one piece of treasure from each quest, so you get to level up a bit, but not too much. If you want to drop an inexperienced mouse into a quest, they'll be a little behind, but not much. Since abilities all require cheese to activate, having more of them just makes you a little more flexible. This also means that, if for some reason you don't want to play the campaign, you can play any scenario with starting mice and not have too many problems.
On the flip side, this means you never really get to improve your character too much, and while there are tons of items to find you'll probably be keeping the same one for a given mouse for most of the campaign.
Scenarios often have specific "required" mice, and vary in number of mice used. Since we didn't just pick our mice and play through the campaign, this really created a lack of attachment. You don't have your character. You've just got whatever mouse you happened to get assigned at the time. While a campaign dungeon crawl is normally really appealling to us, this lack of investment in our characters was quite damaging to our interest.
I suspect many players are really going to enjoy this game, liking the cute minis and the simple gameplay. There's certainly some things going for it. Exploring the castle is clever. You occasionally get a brancing path that affects later stories in a minimal way. The mice have fairly distinctive and interesting abilities.
However, we found it repetitive and dull. There's not much for variety of enemies. You spend most of your turns taking the same action. There's special items (like the fork) that seem like cool ideas, but are almost never useful in practice (and they don't bother to give you a rules card for them, so you keep having to look them up).
It's often very hard to tell which spaces are supposed to connect, leading to have to measure the distance between spaces (it's a rule) with the base of a figure, and usually finding that it's just on the edge and you have no clue.
Scenarios often involve special rules that come into play in certain rooms, with no reminder on the board. You have to keep looking things up in the scenario book. Scenario cards or something would have worked much better.
We also got very confused by a tile-flipping rule that's both non-intuitive, and not used until about 5 scenarios in. If you're playing, say, one scenario a week, good luck remembering a strange rule that you read 5 weeks ago and haven't had to use since then.
There's also a hideously badly designed scenario which is only for 3 players (oh, you were playing through the campaign with a group of 4? Well, screw you!) and has one player playing an 'NPC' that switches sides based on conditions. This is horrendously implemented. You can probably screw the other players over immensely if you really want to, but you could just as easily always play on their side even when you "flipped allegiances" and trust them to flip you back, since it's within player control.
As a final personal note, while the two (out of 6) female characters are fine, they are both clearly bit characters in all the flavor and story. Only once is one a required character, and she's there to be a helpless damsel in distress who literally stays stuck in one room all game.

Get if for:

Cute mice and insect minis.
Simple dungeon crawl gameplay.
Story driven gameplay, if you consider reading chunks of mostly meaningless flavor text for a "story" that you don't really interact with a good thing.

Avoid it if:

You enjoy variety in your decisions.
You feel like you should be attached to a character in a pseudo-rpg.
You don't like having to constantly reference a scenario book.
33. Board Game: Oh no... INVASION!!! [Average Rating:6.05 Overall Rank:5247
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1337930_t.png[/img]
ONE PLAY MINI REVIEW
Our rating:
Modes: Co-op, Solo
Players: 3-5
With a couple: Listed for 3+ only, so you would need to play 2 players each.
Play Time: Unknown. Listed at 30 minutes.
Difficulty: Moderate; variants can increase the difficulty.
Individual/Group Play: Mixed, slighlty more individual play.

Quick Overview Aliens are attacking your station! Play weapons of the right color to destroy them. You can play combos of weapons to get to keep some of the cards you played, so there's an advantage to saving up. You can also upgrade your station to be able to play more cards and trade cards with the other players. Last long enough and you enter a fight with the alien boss.
High luck game of card drawing and hoping you get your upgrades early in the deck. Does maintain a feel of struggling against formidable odds.

Why we didn't buy it: Highly luck driven gameplay that didn't provide much excitement or an interesting challenge.
34. Board Game: Onirim [Average Rating:6.88 Overall Rank:539]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic730580_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Addictive?
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor:
Modes: Co-op, Solo
Players: 1-2
With a couple: Seems designed for 2 players!
Play Time: 20-30 minutes
Difficulty: Medium. Adding different (included) expansions changes up the challenge.
Individual/Group Play: Requires individualality If you play with the 'no communication' rule, which I highly recommend.

Mini-Review
I guess it makes sense that a game about dreams and nightmares is a little odd.
A small card game. You need to unlock four doors (or four doors each in a 2 player game) by playing sets of color matching cards with different symbols, or using keys to shortcut the process. You lose if the deck of cards runs out, so you need to manage your cards very carefully.
In a two player game, you have a few cards in hand and a few cards on the table face up in a "shared hand" that either player can use.
Gameplay is pretty simple; you play a card, or you swap a card with the shared hand.
The game suggests a variant where you cannot talk with the other player. I highly recommend this variant. It makes for a very interesting game; you need to help your partner by getting them cards they need, but you can't directly talk about it so you need to figure out what they want by their actions.
The game comes with several "expansions"; additional cards that you can add into the game, each with their own rules and changes. Each expansions offers both additional challenges and additional tools to overcome the challenges. Good for long-term replay value. Bad because we can never remember how the game works, and just end up playing the base game whenver we go back to it.

Get if for:

Simple and light gamplay.
A good travl co-op; portable and requiring little play space.
A tricky communication challenge.
A pleasantly surreal theme.

Avoid it if:

You want a lot of depth or rules.
You have a hard time remembering lots of variants.
35. Board Game: Pandemic [Average Rating:7.62 Overall Rank:47]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic254416_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性:
策略因素: Experience counts, but so does the luck of the draw.
模式: 合作、单人
2人：不错
个人/小组游戏: 混合
基本信息：1-4人，60分钟，3个难度级别
简评：引领合作类游戏的潮流
你可以得到：团队合作；不常见的主题；适合非玩家的游戏；胜负经常到最后一刻
无视，如果你：想要深度背景

36为35的扩充

anf

本帖最后由 anf 于 2013-7-28 22:33 编辑

37. Board Game: Police Precinct [Average Rating:7.31 Overall Rank:1191]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1356968_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Addictive?
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: Low-Moderate
Modes: Co-op, Solo, Hidden Traitor
Players: 1-6
With a couple: Slight variant; you have extra "NPC" cop cars to move around. Works fine.
Play Time: 1-2 hours
Difficulty: Low. Some scaling options.
Individual/Group Play: Rewards group play.

Mini-Review
Police Precinct is a Pandemic style game; you try to manage various short term threats while also working to solve a relatively unconnected long term goal. Most of the game is moving around a board trying to stop the most threatening crisis. I suppose a lot of co-ops can be boiled down to that, but this one, while not looking much like Pandemic, just had a lot of the same feel to me.
Each player controls a police officer, and you drive around the city trying to stop crimes in progress and street gangs while also investigating a murder.
Many actions are luck driven; dice to stop crimes, card draws to find evidence. Players have hands of bonus cards that they can play on anyone else's action, so you can all pitch in a bit. You can also get a bonus by having another player along when you take an action.
Its solid and playable. There's technically a bit more variety than Pandemic - you can even "level up" your cop to improve your stats (though we rarely have found it worth the time to do so). However, the decisions generally haven't felt as interesting, and overall the game is a bit bland. We have liked playing it, but after a few plays when we've got have rarely bothered to go back to it.
The game also is designed for a "dirty cop" traitor variant where one player works against the team. We have not and probably will not played that way, but my impression is that it shares the flaws that I dislike about most traitor games, where the traitor and players don't so much play against each other as the traitor simply tries to play badly. A few of the traitor mechanics look particularly poorly thought out, such as a card that involves a bid between the players; it would be exceedingly silly for anyone to actually bid against each other - just pick a random player to get the card!
As a minor pet peeve, since they bothered to make the police officer cards double sided anyway, and the markers are just cars, why not include a female character on one side and a male on the other to be more gender inclusive?

Get if for:

A police theme for a basic co-op game.
A solid game with a decent amount of mechanical variety.
Optional traitor game play.

Avoid it if:

You've already got a Pandemic-style game and want to keep your collection small.

You don't like a heavy dice influence.

                                                                                                                                                                                             [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2734613#item2734613]38.[/url]    Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/127/princess-ryans-star-marines]Princess Ryan's Star Marines[/url]      [Average Rating:5.31 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=8128#8128]8128[/url]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic328153_t.jpg[/img]
NOT A CO-OP
Rating:
This older game is cited as a co-op every now and then. While it "looks" like a team (the Star Marines) vs. one player (the Dark Legion), and there are rules for automating the Dark Legion, that doesn't make it cooperative. The main part of the marine game is focused on trying to score individual points in each encounter, which you do by playing a higher card than your allies. Try to play full co-op and this all collapses. It might be possible to come up with a co-op variant, however.
39. Board Game: Prophecy [Average Rating:6.75 Overall Rank:742
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic186716_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Addictive?
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: Moderate. Mix of skill and luck.
Modes: Competitive, Co-op/Solo with Dragon Realm expansion or variant.
Players: 1-6
With a couple: Plays very well.
Play Time: 2-3 hours.
Difficulty: Not enough plays to be sure.
Individual/Group Play: Doesn't discourage group play, but has more of an individual feel to it.

Mini-Review
One of Chvatil's less successful games. Prophecy is a fantasy adventure with very clear inspiration from Talisman. Travel around the board, fight monsters, gain treasures and power, and seek to claim the artifacts to win the game.
While the original game is competitive, the Dragon Realm expansion included a cooperative variant. However, the BGGer Deebs has posted an even better co-op variant using just the base game!
However, even if you just want to play the variant, the Dragon Realm expansion does give you alternative cards to use in a co-op game to replace the PvP skill cards.
The main difference from Talisman is in less randomness and more interesting character development. Instead of rolling a die to move around a board, you travel a consistent one space per turn, but can spend gold to use horses and ships to travel faster.
Characters start out all pretty much the same, but you can diversify a lot by learning "skills" which are available in various guilds throughout the game.
It's a solid fantasy adventure game, but a bit long for what it is. The Dragon Realm is also marred by a misprinting; key board elements are completely wrong!

Get if for:

Fantasy adventure.
Lots of ways to build up a character.
Lots of cards worth of different monsters, gear and encounters.
You like Talisman, but feel it's too random.

Avoid it if:

You like Talisman, but wish it was a bit more random.
You like Talisman, but think it's too long.
You aren't going to enjoy wandering around a board rolling dice to "fight" random monsters.
40. Board Game: Quest Cards [Average Rating:4.70 Overall Rank:8014]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic90984_t.jpg[/img]Our rating:
Addictive?
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: This should perhaps be a 0, but there's no '0' side on a d6. This is pure luck.
Modes: Claimed Co-op, Competitive
Players: 2-
With a couple: No worse than with any other number.
Play Time: 30 minutes or less.
Difficulty: No idea.
Individual/Group Play: Not enough skill to matter.

Mini-Review
A dungeon adventure card game. Some cards form a map of an area (a castle or a mountain in the two provided scenarios). You travel around the map, flipping cards over to explore them and fighting the monsters you find. When you find a monster or trap, you roll dice to see if you beat it. Items modify your rolls and chances. If there is any skill (and I'm not sure there is), it's only there in small amounts.
In the normal game, you race against the other players to complete an objective. While the game claims to be playable co-op, and includes rules for players forming a party, there's no mention made of what to use as the goal for a co-op game.
One thing I do like about the game is how they handled improving skills; a skill normally has four levels; two each on each side of a card. Flip a card upside down when you advance it to level 2 to see the level 2 skill. Turn it over when you get to level 3. Flip it back rightside up for level 4. A nice and convenient way of tracking variable skills.
If you actually want to play an essentially mindless game, and come up with a good objective for solo/co-op, it's not all that bad. I realize that's strange to say, but...just wandering around and seeing if you beat the monsters and gain new skills can be kind of fun.

Get if for:

Mindless adventure.
A nice skill mechanic.
A game for kids who aren't ready to make decisions anyway.

Avoid it if:

You want stratey. Or tactics. Or choices. Or the illusion of choices.
You actually want co-op rules.
I could go on, but if you haven't been put off already, I don't think any of the other flaws are really that important.
41. Board Game: Rabbit [Average Rating:5.80 Unranked]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic865119_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Addictive?
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: Hard to say. Moderate? Some skill in resource managment, a chunk of luck in exploration and event cards.
Modes: Solo
Players: 1-2. Well, sort of 2.
With a couple: This is really a solo game. With 2 player, you just share the pieces.
Play Time: 20-30 minutes
Difficulty: Hard to say.
Individual/Group Play: This is a one player game. Even sharing pieces, resources are critically limited and each move must be considered very carefully for the whole group.

Mini-Review
I really want to like this. The theme - growing a group of rabbits - is different and cool, and the mechanics look interesting. I really, really, want to like it.
But...I feel like it's a rough prototype of a game, with rules that don't really quite work.
First, "co-op" play consists of "share the pieces". But resources are so incredibly tight that you really need to consider each move very carefully, so in practice you are really just discussing what moves to make.
Resource scarcity should be an interesting element. But in Rabbit, it's just such a limitation that moves wind up being very obvious. There are several options that you are just never going to use because they aren't resource efficient enough, and the game requires brutal efficiency.
Not a lot to say here. We played once or twice and were dissappointed. We've pondered house rules but never came up with anything.

Get if for:

A unique and different theme.

Avoid it if:

You have ever, ever complained that co-ops are really solo games or uttered the phrase "alpha player".
Your tastes remotely align with ours and you don't want to be fairly bored while playing a game.
42. Board Game: Red November [Average Rating:6.43 Overall Rank:895]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic973939_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Addictive?
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: Mostly luck of the dice
Modes: Co-op, sorta traitor
Players: 1-8
With a couple: We usually play 2 gnomes each, which is easy to do.
Play Time: 45 min - 1 hour, longer with more players.
Difficulty: Moderate. Very luck dependnt.
Individual/Group Play: Not really enough skill to matter much. Some coordination and commitee planning is helpful.

Mini-Review
Ah, the fun of trying to stay alive on a leaking, burning, malfunctioning submarine. While drunk!
The players control gnomes on an ill-fated submarine which is having everything go wrong. Your gnomes run around rolling dice to try fix these disasters and keep the sub alive long enough to be rescued.
The game uses a "time" based turn mechanic; the player fartherest back on the time track takes a turn, moving their marker forward based on how many actions they take. Move 1 space? 1 minute. Try to fix a problem? 1 minute per 1/10 chance of success you want.
There's not a lot of depth to this. Ideally, you want to choose to fix something by taking the exact amount of time as the number you are going to roll. Because, if you take 5 minutes and roll a 6, you failed to fix it and wasted five minutes. If you take 10 minutes and roll a 6, you did at least fix it, but wasted 4 minutes. Since you have no idea what you are going to roll, this is just random guessing. (An old adage applies here: If you don't have time to do it right, you don't have time to do it twice!)
As each gnome's time track advances, you pass spaces that force you to draw new disastrous event cards. But, since you need to get to the nd of th time track to be rescued, you have to get past them.
This is actually a pretty amusing game. It's fun to around the ship and watch it sink and flood and scramble like crazy trying to fix it all. But if ocean were as shallow as the gameplay, the gnomes could just walk to land.
There's a traitor rule included, where at a certain point a gnome could potentially abandon ship, and then wins if everyone else loses. We've never used it; aside from not being interested in a traitor game, it doesn't look like a very good rule to us, with poor interaction between a traitor and non-traitors.

Get if for:

An very portable game IF you can find the 1st edition. They went with a full size box in the later version, thus defeating one of the game's best points.
Chaotic silly dice rolling.
Laughing at misfortune.
A co-op that plays up to 8. I have no ideas how it is with more than 4 though; it seems like it could drag a lot.

Avoid it if:

You want a game that's not almost all luck.
You are averse to random misfortune.
You don't want player elimination in a game.

43. Board Game: Robinson Crusoe: Adventure on the Cursed Island [Average Rating:8.05 Overall Rank:182]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1413154_t.jpg[/img]评分:
上瘾度 一般
长期可重玩性:
策略因素:
模式: 合作、单人
2人：有变体规则
个人/小组游戏: 强烈偏向小组
基本信息：1-4人，60_{120分钟，难度根据场景而不同但普遍较难}
简评：工人放置。探索岛屿，收集食物和补给品，打猎…….。有多个场景，不同的挑战。
你可以得到：巧妙的挑战；不同的场景；结合了工人放置、探索、建设
无视，如果你：游戏玩家中有人总想当老大；觉得优化资源收集计划很无聊

                                                                                                                                                                                                [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2436380#item2436380]44.[/url]    Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/102652/sentinels-of-the-multiverse]Sentinels of the Multiverse[/url]    [Average Rating:7.74 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=103#103]103[/url]]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1039999_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性:
策略因素:
模式: 合作
2人：1人玩2个英雄
个人/小组游戏: 混合
基本信息：2-5人，60分钟，难度根据游戏初始和坏人选择有很大变化
简评：卡牌游戏，超能力战斗。
你可以得到：和主题结合紧密的行动；大量变化；很酷的角色
无视，如果你：不喜欢大量加减法

45. Board Game: Shadowrift [Average Rating:7.47 Overall Rank:1446]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1315597_t.png[/img]
评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性:
策略因素: -
模式: 合作
2人：不错
个人/小组游戏: 混合
基本信息：2-6人，90_{120分钟，难度通常低}
简评：合作牌组构建。和怪物对抗，保卫城镇
你可以得到：主题牌组构建；面对不同挑战；根据英雄卡的不同游戏差异很大
无视，如果你：介意每回合计算太多

                                                                                                                                                                                                [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2740504#item2740504]46.[/url]    Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/15062/shadows-over-camelot]Shadows over Camelot[/url]     [Average Rating:7.13 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=238#238]238[/url]]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic70547_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Addictive?
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: Moderate
Modes: Traitor, Co-op suggested only for learning the game
Players: 3-7
With a couple: Unplayable as written, but you can play it as a co-op by using 2 knights each and ignoring the traitor rules.
Play Time: 1-2 hours, depending on player count
Difficulty: Low as a co-op. Not enough experience with a traitor to judge.
Individual/Group Play: Leans towards group play, though it's not clear how much you are allowed to discuss. With the traitor, the game can force group play even more, as you don't want to just let a player make mistakes; 'making mistakes' could be an indicator that the player is the traitor.

Mini-Review.
I'm not sure Shadows should even be on this list, but there were several requests for it.
Shadows sets the players as knights of the round table, attempting to complete a variety of quests to stop the forces that would destroy Camelot. On each turn, you take an Evil action (either drawing a card from the evil deck, adding a siege engine to the attack on Camelot, or losing a life) and then take a Good action (moving, drawing cards, or playing a card to complete a quest). The knights try to gather enough white swords from completing quests to win the game, while too many black swords (from failing quests) will make them lose.
Most of the gameplay is driven by a deck of cards, that contains a lot of standard quest cards (mostly 'Fight' cards of values 1-5, which are used on several quests) and a few special cards.
While most of the game is co-op, normal play includes a traitor. At the start of the game, you deal a face down 'loyalty' card to each player. The deck of 8 cards contains 7 'Loyal' cards and one 'Traitor' card. You use the full deck each time, so there's not necessarily a traitor (in fact, a lot of the games we've played had no traitor by random deal!). The traitor wins if the knights lose. To this end, they can try to fare badly on quests, or add siege engines to the castle at bad times, or even capture Lancelot's armor which lets you secretly pick which of two evil cards to play each turn (very good for a Loyal knight to have...very nasty for the Traitor to have!)
I'm not overly fond of the traitor dynamic. While I think the concept is interesting, in practice the traitor mostly just tries to play poorly, but not so poorly that they are noticed. Or, they just play obviously and reveal themselves but still cause trouble (possibly by just adding a siege engine to Camelot every turn). Or, if the game starts going badly for the knights as is, they just act like a normal knight and let the white -> black swords flips that happen for failing to find a traitor defeat the knights. None of these options seem like much fun to me. Granted, I've only played two games that actually included a traitor, so I can't judge very accurately. In one of these games, by the way, the traitor was a new player and felt very frustrated; he felt like he could never do anything traitorous because his moves were being too heavily dictated.
The rest of the game play is decent, if abstract. You try to manage your hand of cards, figure out which quests you can complete and which ones you want to stall or abandon. Because moving from quest to quest is costly, you'll often make a decision about which quest to undertake which will determine your actions for a few turns in a row.
There are a few oddly unthematic elements to the game. For example, you don't want to complete the Excalibur or Grail quests too early in the game. Once these quests are completed, the evil cards that normally play on those quests instead add siege engines, which are overall worse.
The game is wonderfully produced, with miniatures for the knights, invaders, siege engines. The boards and cards have lovely and colorful illustrations.
If you want a game for groups of 4+, like the traitor mechanic, and don't mind the somewhat abstract nature of the game, I think this is a great game to add to your collection with a lot of visual appeal. I wouldn't recommend playing too much in a row though, as it can become repetitive pretty quickly. If you're considering it for a true co-op or won't usually have a group of 4+, don't bother.
We have played it as a co-op with the two of us controlling two knights each. This was fun for a play or two, but didn't hold up for long.

Get if for:

A visually gorgeous game with wonderful components.
Simple but tense gameplay.
The paranoia of having a traitor in your midst.

Avoid it if:

You are looking for a true co-op.
You are bored by abstracted mechanics.
You'll be bothered by unclear communication rules.

47. Board Game: Space Alert [Average Rating:7.64 Overall Rank:59]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic384313_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性:
策略因素: Almost all skill.
模式: 合作、单人
2人：可以，但乐趣不如人多
个人/小组游戏: 鼓励个人
基本信息：1-5人（最好4_{5人），30分钟，难度变化很大}
简评：我们最爱的合作类游戏。实时历险，大量行动，让一个太空船保持航行
你可以得到：紧张的行动；大量玩家互动、笑声、惊叫；精巧的计划，谜题挑战
无视，如果你：不喜欢实时

48为47的扩展

49. Board Game: Space Cadets [Average Rating:7.21 Overall Rank:550]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1362404_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Modes: Co-op
Players: 3-6
With a couple: Not 2 player playable as written. You could probably spread out the stations between 2 players if you wanted to.
Play Time: Listed at 1.5 hours. Our first play added about an hour just to set up and teach.
Difficulty: Not sure. Scenario based, so it will vary.
Individual/Group Play: Generally individual, as there is very little interaction at all.

Quick Overview
Command a ship by playing 30 second mini-games!
That about says it all. You are the crew of a spaceship, and you navigate it around and fire weapons and power shields by means of playing little minigames of Ubongo and Memory Match (I wish I were kidding about that one) and Take it Easy and such. Each round, you have about 30 seconds during which each player plays their minigame.
While the gameplay is light and the individual games are simple, there are a lot of them and a lot of rules to explain. Teaching this game for our first play was pretty nightmarish, and it ran long in total.
Some of the mini games are fun (like the robo-rally-esque) ship handling. Some are much less fun (Memory match?! Seriously?) If all of your group dislikes the same game (Memor...ok, you get the idea) the play experience will suffer.
There's very little interaction overall; you each just rush to do your own little puzzle.

                                                                                                                                                                                               [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2679160#item2679160]50.[/url]       Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/71721/space-hulk-death-angel-the-card-game]Space Hulk: Death Angel - The Card Game[/url]      [Average Rating:7.00 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=344#344]344[/url]]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic887340_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Addictive? - Avg -
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: There is skill and planning in setting up actions, but a lot of planning can be crushed by a few bad die rolls.
Modes: Co-op, Solo
Players: 1-6*

The more players you have, the more likely you are to have player elimination.
With a couple: Plays well, but you have to control two squads each. Since each squad is two characters to begin with, I don't know how the "only want to play one character" crowd will feel about it.
Play Time: 1.5 - 2 hours
Difficulty: Overall low
Individual/Group Play: Strongly discourages individuality. The entire group must plan together for actions to be useful.

Mini-Review
A team of elite Space Marines journeys into the pathways of an ancient derelict starship to control swarms of deadly alien foes.
Death Angel is a co-op card game version of the classic skirmish boardgame. Rather than having a board or map to move around on, the marines are formed into a line and can face either left or right. Various locations along the line offer places to interact with and sources for the genestealers to spawn. The marines must progress though an area by cleaering at least one of the two spawn decks for each location, eventually reaching the final mission target. There are a few mission objectives with slightly different conditions. You might need to wipe out all the genestealers in the last room, or escape from the space hulk.
Each player controls one or more squads of two marines. On a turn, everyone picks an action card for each marine squad. You can move or support or attack. You can't play the same card twice in a row, so you need to plan ahead; if you shoot one turn, you can't shoot the next! You also need to plan carefully with the other players. Because you can only take one action each turn, if you need to shoot a genestealer that's out of range, you'll need someone else to make the move that will put you in range.
The different marine teams have a nice mix of special abilities, and there's a decent variety of locations to encounter to keep the game fresh.
The game does a good job of capturing the feel of the boardgame. There's a lot of tension as you fight through the Space Hulk, and a decent challenge in figuring out the right moves. However, the luck factor can be crushingling frustrating; you've often got no chance but to rely on 50/50 rolls to come out well. Our first game was lost entirely on rolling five 0's in a row.
While this has some good things going for it, it hasn't held up well with us; we haven't felt like there's enough gameplay there to keep us coming back after our first few plays. Due to the extremely high amount of coordination, it lends itself to having a few players play for the group. Between this, a long playtime, and player elimination, we usually haven't been interested in taking it to gaming groups.

Get if for:

Tense and thematic action.
A lot of game in a small package.
Tricky puzzle card planning situations.

Avoid it if:

Your group minds player elimination.
You have worries about a bossy player running the show.

You mind having lots of tough planning crushed by a bad die roll.

                                                                                                                                                                                           [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2733080#item2733080]51.[/url]     Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/130295/spellbound]Spellbound[/url]      [Average Rating:6.86 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=2145#2145]2145[/url]]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1477174_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性: 平均
策略因素: Moderate.
模式: 合作、单人
2人：不错
个人/小组游戏: 非常偏向于小组
基本信息：1-4人，30_{45分钟，难度低但可增加}
简评：配件很大、很酷、很雷。牌组构建，所有人共享一个牌组。
你可以得到：很大的配件；巧妙的牌组构建和手牌管理
无视，如果你：介意玩小组游戏；不喜欢占地太大的游戏；真的想买（绝版了）

                                                                                                                                                                                                [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2731385#item2731385]52.[/url]        Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/79131/star-trek-expeditions]Star Trek: Expeditions[/url]           [Average Rating:6.64 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=1088#1088]1088[/url]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1021598_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Addictive?
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: Low. Some planning, but luck of the dice rules.
Modes: Co-op, Solo
Players: 1-4
With a couple: Supposed to play normally 2 player, but we've always played two characters each.
Play Time: 1 hour
Difficulty: 3 difficulty settings; overall low difficulty.
Individual/Group Play: Generally encourages group decisions.

Mini-Review
To boldy go where no Clix models have gone before!
Star Trek Expeditions puts you in command of the bridge crew of the Enterprise (the new movie version), journeying to a plant in peril and attempting to resolve diplomatic and scientific crises while battling a Klingon takeover.
Most of the game consists of moving to a spot and making a skill check, modified by cards you can play. Succeed at checks to make progess in events. You need to balance which tasks you have the skills to complete successfully and which tasks are more urgent.
The game uses WizKids (in?)famous clix dial system, which means you constantly have to check little numbers on the dial. It also means that your abilities degrade as you get hurt, so there can be snowball effects from failing.
There's flavor text on the various task cards, but they are really all pretty samey. Move to the spot, roll some dice, see if you make progress or take some damage.
A major/minor* part of the game is the fight between the Klingon cruiser and the Enterprise. Which consists of occasionally rolling some dice to see which ship damages the other. Hey, at least you can play some cards (which you needed to draw randomly) to influence the outcome.

The ship battle is very important to how well you do in the game. In fact, it's one of the most important factors to your overall score. In that way, it's major. However, you have very little control of it, and almost no decisions to make regarding it. In that way it's minor. In my book, that's not a good combo.
My one sentence summary of Star Trek Expeditions? "It's a rental".
There's some fun stuff, and seeing the different cards for the first time and figuring out how to manage the system can be interesting. We had fun on our first play, but by play 3 we'd seen everything the game has to offer. Been there, done that. Maybe we'll play again when it's been long enough to forget about it.

Get if for:

Satisfying your co-op Star Trek addiction.
An amsuing game or two of fairly low-theme die rolling.
Having in your collection so you can be nice the one to loan it to other games so they can get in their one or two plays.

Avoid it if:

You want a lot of replay value.

You want an immersive theme in your Star Trek game.

                                                                                                                                                                                            [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2731387#item2731387]53.[/url]        Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/35815/a-touch-of-evil-the-supernatural-game]A Touch of Evil: The Supernatural Game[/url]           [Average Rating:7.04 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=414#414]414[/url]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic326493_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Addictive?
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: Low. Luck of the draw and dice.
Modes: Competitive, Co-op, Team
Players: 1-8
With a couple: Plays normally.
Play Time: 1-2 hours
Difficulty: Varies based on the villain, but generally low.
Individual/Group Play: Not really enough skill to matter.

Mini-Review
A Touch of Evil puts the players into the roles of colonial era investigators squaring off supernatural forces in a small town. The movie Sleepy Hollow was obviously a major inspiration.
The mechanics are straighforward; draw an evil card to see what bad stuff happens, then move your characters around a map-like board to find gear and "clues" (basically currency) to power up and fight the villain before time runs out.
There's enormous potential here. The characters are cool, and there's a nice variety of stuff that can happen. The game comes with four different villains, each of which plays a bit differently.
There's also some major stumbling points. The game really seems designed for competitive play; some cards just don't work well in a co-op game, and the secrets mechanic for the townsfolk barely works in a co-op game at all.
There's also a lack of driving force in the game. You just sort of wander around and meet random stuff. There's very little reason to travel to any particular place. The villain occasionally kills town elders, but you can't try to protect them; it doesn't feel like you are interacting with the villain at all until the showdown.
If you don't mind that, or can houserule around it, it's a decent game.

Get if for:

Engaging theme.
Nice models and presentation.
A choice of co-op, team and competitive play.

Avoid it if:

You like having real decisions on a normal basis.

You'll mind that some mechanics aren't really meant for a co-op.

                                                                                                                                                                                            [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2734606#item2734606]54.[/url]      Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/94389/urbion]Urbion[/url]         [Average Rating:7.19 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=1555#1555]1555[/url]]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1599589_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Addictive?
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: Moderate.
Modes: Co-op, Solo.
Players: 1-2
With a couple: Plays normally.
Play Time: 15-30 minutes
Difficulty: Moderate.
Individual/Group Play: Very group play oriented; lots of planning required.

Mini-Review
The 'sequel' to Onirim (with very little in common) has you trying to balance good and bad dreams in dream cities. Each dream has a positive or negative number; if you balance the positives and negatives in a city, you can 'score' it and replace it with a new city. You must balance all 12 cities (of which you have 4 out at a time) to win. Gameplay is pretty straight forward; you either play a card to a city, discard a card in order to swap two cards already on the board, or discard a card to claim all the currently balanced cities. If you run out of cards you lose, so you have to manage your actions carefully.
Overall, the game feels like a number puzzle, as you add and swap values to try to get matches. It's a playable game, but we found little excitement or investment in it.
The game comes with a few 'modules' to add in, but we haven't gotten to any of those yet, and it's doubtful we ever will.

Get it for:

A number shuffling puzzle.
Planning ahead.

Avoid it if:

You want excitement in your game.
You want strong theme in your game.
55. Board Game: Vanished Planet [Average Rating:5.96 Overall Rank:3157]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic246222_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Addictive?
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor:
Modes: Co-op
Players: 1-6
With a couple: Works great just playing one race each.
Play Time: Listed at 1 hour.
Difficulty: Easy with the base setup, but very easy to add more 'Creature Growth' cards which will ramp up the difficulty and can make the game very nasty.
Individual/Group Play: Slightly encourages playing by committee.

Mini-Review
A huge interstellar creature has engulfed the Earth, and spreads outwards towards the other major inhabited worlds. You must find a way to stop it before all life is devoured.
I really want to love this game. It's so different from many co-ops. It's got resource productions, building up different technologies, trading resources, traveling around the galaxy. There's a ton of awesome here.
However, there awesome is badly impaired by having to manage a lot of building costs, which come in various steps. You'll need a, for example, a Meta-translator to help build a communication array. To build a meta-translator you need a scientist and a two diplomats. To train a scientist you need ore and tech and colonist resources. To train a diplomat you need money and colonist resources.
On top of that, the resources are poorly distinguished. All the symbols for different resources are in the same colored sphere, making them hard to tell apart. Cards are sometimes referenced by symbol and sometimes by name, with no clear ready way to tell which which.
This is fiddly as hell.
Other than that, you rush around trying to accomplish various goals to score enough points to win. You can also build more ships and upgrade your ships with faster drives or teleports. Some goals do seem a lot easier relative to their points than others.
The basic game is almost always right down to the last few moments when you win. It does a great job of producing a feel of imminent doom.
I really like the gameplay, but the fiddliness of all the build trees and the resource cards is a big downer for us.

Get if for:

Resource gathering and building.
A lot of tension and dread.
Highy scalable difficulty.
Good scaling for multiple player counts.

Avoid it if:

You have ever uttered the word 'fiddly' as a complaint against a game.
You can't keep layers of resource building straight.

You don't see the point of starships that don't have weapons on them.
56. Board Game: Vulkan! [Average Rating:6.29 Overall Rank:5716]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic55660_t.jpg[/img]
评论和Feurio一样

                                                                                                                                                                                            [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/146419/item/2733060#item2733060]57.[/url]        Board Game: [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/1634/warhammer-quest]Warhammer Quest[/url]       [Average Rating:7.42 Overall Rank:[url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browse/boardgame?rank=353#353]353[/url]

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic355859_t.jpg[/img]
Our rating:
Addictive?
Long Term Replayability:
Skill Factor: Low.
Modes: Co-op
Players: 1-4
With a couple: You need to play 2 characters each.
Play Time: 1.5-2 hours for a single game. Much longer for a campaign.
Difficulty: It's probabaly impossible to get through a normal campaign with normal rules. On a per quest basis, anywhere from ridiculously easy to impossible depending on luck of the dice and level of the heroes.
Individual/Group Play: Not enough skill to matter.

Mini-Review
It's horribly designed. It's clunky as hell. It doesn't seem to know women even exist. It has no idea what balance is. It rewards dumb tricks while lacking any skill in most areas. Key components are practically unusable out of the box. It has stats you never use.
And if you like dungeon crawl games at all, and get the chance to buy it at anything approaching a reasonable price, you should grab it.
Warhammer Quest is a campaign oriented dungeon crawl adventure. Take a party of heroes and venture into a randomly generated dungeon. There's almost no plot. Place random tiles, fight the monsters that appear. There's not much maneuvering. The monsters pop up, you roll dice to bop them.
Why the heck was this game so incredibly addictive?
The campaign was definetly a major piece. The game is designed around leveling up heroes, which gives you better stats and (one of our favorite part) a variety of randomly rolled skills.
It even has extensive ~~rolls~~ rules for what happens to you in between the dungeon, which consists of rolling on a big table each day in a town to find out what unpleasant event (or occasionally handy opportunity) befell you that day.
The base game comes with 5 characters (one with no mini, just rules), which is really not enough for long term play. GW made a ton of extra minis however, and many fans have added even more.
We put tons of effort into making the components more playable. We made monster cards for the entire book worth of monsters so we wouldn't have to look up their stats in the hard-to-use table. We made cards for all the treasures in the book to replace the table. We made reference cards for all the monster spells. We made cards for all the PC Wizard spells. We added damage counters and a variety of effect markers.
We also added tons of houserules, pretty much rewriting all the traveling and event tables. We made dozens of custom characters, and played them all heavily.
And yet we enjoyed the game every step of the way.
I doubt I'd have the time to put that much effort into a game these days; the downside of being an adult and no longer a college student! And we don't play it much anymore; even with this much variety, we burned out eventually (HUNDREDS of plays later), and the mechanics look awfully clunky compared to modern games.
But there's no denying that we got an enormous amount of fun out of this game.

Get if for:

A game that can keep you busy for a very, very long time.
Extensive campaign play.
Silly monster bashing.
Random loot and skill gathering.

Avoid it if:

You have even the slightest, tiniest, smallest aversion to dice.
You don't have tons of time to put into improving the game.
You want a well balanced, elegantly designed system.
You mind playing with innaccurate miniatures. (Ignore this if you have a fortune to spend or if you already own the world's biggest fantasy GW collection).
You don't have a fortune to spend.
58. Board Game: Witch of Salem [Average Rating:6.71 Overall Rank:901
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic564525_t.jpg[/img]评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性:
策略因素: -
模式: 合作
2人：不错
个人/小组游戏: 混合
基本信息：2-4人，30_{45分钟，难度高}
简评：大门、恶魔，常见的主题。机制优雅抽象。速度快，不是一手牌。
你可以得到：很好的恶魔恐惧气氛；简单快速推进；一次次的打败敌人
无视，如果你：介意被诅咒；喜欢大量的文字和规则细节

59. Board Game: Wok Star [Average Rating:7.15 Overall Rank:1162
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic728335_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性: 平均
策略因素: Skill really helps, but the dice can mess you up in a major way.
模式: 合作
2人：不太好
个人/小组游戏: 鼓励个人
基本信息：2-4人，20_{60分钟，3个难度等级}
简评：在中餐馆做菜。每回合初掷骰子，根据点数获取食材来做菜。
你可以得到：快速疯狂的实时交互；巧妙地资源管理，提高自己的生意
无视，如果你：不喜欢实时；只喜欢2人游戏；喜欢深度策略

60. Board Game: Yggdrasil [Average Rating:7.19 Overall Rank:352]
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic953922_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度
长期可重玩性:
策略因素:
模式: 合作、单人
2人：不错
个人/小组游戏: 鼓励小组
基本信息：1-6人，60_{90分钟，难度变化大}
简评：挪威传说主题。选择行动的游戏。
你可以得到：谜题一样的挑战，高度伸缩；主题和美工好；1_{6人都合适}
无视，如果你：不喜欢管理配件；介意在游戏结束前就知道自己已经赢了

61. Board Game: Zombicide [Average Rating:7.79 Overall Rank:115
http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1196191_t.jpg[/img]
评分:
上瘾度 - Avg -
长期可重玩性:
策略因素: 适中
模式: 合作
2人：每人操纵3家
个人/小组游戏: 鼓励小组
基本信息：1-6人，60_{120分钟，难度随剧本变化}
简评：僵尸主题。杀僵尸，逃离险境。运气成分大，也有不少策略。
你可以得到：大杀四方的行动；多个剧本；海量模型
无视，如果你：不喜欢奇怪的规则；喜欢不同的角色；不喜欢用反直觉和反主题的策略

xsssssssch

这夫妻俩口味真奇怪，好多本应束之高阁的游戏。。。

波菠罗

夫妻之间有一个是博爱主义者就可以得出这类包含森罗万象的游戏list了。

大致看了下上面提到的评价，就那些我和我LP一起玩过的来说评价挺中肯啊。

dddxxx88

mark 慢慢看

bgger

看到瘟疫危机居然有这么高的评价，我想，这些游戏都不适合我们夫妻俩吧

pxfxs

上哪找这种老婆去

xxn00

我家媳妇喜欢跟我玩互车的游戏。。。

ab76126

感謝無私的分享

Teaonefoot

今天才看到，好评